Search »

Proposed Government Website Would Fall Short of Protecting the Public from Risk of Injury

 WASHINGTON, DC (February 2, 2010) — A proposed consumer product incident database run by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (Commission) could turn into a portal for consumers to express their dissatisfaction with products and companies, thereby diminishing the real intent of the database, according to the Consumer Specialty Products Association (CSPA).

“The scope of claims to be included in this database was neither defined by the Commission in its proposal nor by Congress in language that amended the Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA),” said Chris Cathcart, CSPA President. “Opinion-based comments regarding a product’s quality and effectiveness—versus its safety—should be considered outside the scope of the incident database. The intent of the database is to protect the public, not serve as a platform from which consumers can essentially blog about products and companies.”

In a report to Congress on September 10, 2009, the Commission explained how it would implement the consumer products safety incident database as required under section 6A of the CPSA.  This is a new requirement mandated by the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008.

CSPA expressed significant concerns to the Commission in a letter dated January 29.

“While we support the Commission’s mission to protect the public from unreasonable risk or injury, the incident database as laid out by the agency will not further this mission,” Cathcart concluded.